Kaizen and the Supply Chain

Kaizen is a Japanese term which means "change for the better." A company that practices kaizen is making small changes for the better on an ongoing basis- this is commonly called continuous improvement. Over the past 15 to 20 years, kaizen has become synonymous with the kaizen event, a focused improvement "blitz" in which a team works to improve (i.e., kaizen) a process. These are actually quite different. While the kaizen event is a still a very useful tool for improving points in a value stream, the term "kaizen" refers to a way of thinking, not a single tool.

Practicing kaizen means eliminating waste. Toyota's Taichi Ohno identified the "seven wastes" of manufacturing as:

• Overproduction
• Waiting
• Processing
• Motion
• Inventory
• Transportation
• Defects

If a company is truly practicing kaizen, every employee from the shop floor worker to the CEO is working to eliminate waste on a daily basis.

But how do we approach kaizen for an entire supply chain? If within a single organization, we are asking each employee to think lean and to eliminate waste, then within the supply chain we must ask each organization to do the same. However, simply performing kaizen within the individual companies comprising a supply chain is not sufficient. Not only must we ask them to begin practicing kaizen within their four walls, we must work on supply chain improvement as a whole. This is because there are often wastes within a supply chain that we can only see when we consider the entire supply chain rather than simply one organization or process within it.

So, we've determined that we need to kaizen both the supply chain as a whole as well as the individual organizations and processes within it. What are the tools that help us accomplish this?

1. Value Stream Mapping. Value stream mapping helps us to see the entire picture and identify changes (kaizen) that will improve the supply chain as a whole. Through VSM, we understand the sources of waste created within material and information flows.

2. Supplier Associations. Supplier associations help improve communication and knowledge across a supply chain, thus enabling kaizen throughout the supply chain.

3. Kaizen Events. Kaizen events can help us implement improvements to particular points within the value stream.

4. Other Kaizen/Lean Tools. All of the traditional lean tools such as Standardized Work, One Piece Flow Cells, Kanban/Pull, Visual Controls, Quick Changeover/Single Minute Exchange of Die (SMED), 5S, Total Productive Maintenance, and others can help improve a supply chain.

Each of the above works together to kaizen an entire supply chain. 

Successful Procurement Process

1. Spend plenty of time planning

◆ Consider at the outset the full extent of what needs to be done, by whom, and by when. Who needs to be involved? Are they being consulted?

◆ Seek advice from others (departments, local authorities etc.). It’s always harder if you start with a blank piece of paper.

◆ Establish a complete procedure timetable with consultation periods, approval dates, invitation, receipt and evaluation of quotations, interviews, contract award etc.

◆ Ensure adequate time is allowed for the whole process.

2. Establish roles and responsibilities

◆ Establish the roles and responsibilities of all involved. For example, who is to decide/approve the short list? Who will be responsible for the quality and price evaluations?

◆ Get everyone to contribute to the planning process, including internal Lawyers and Auditors. Be clear what approvals are required from elected Members and their role in the whole process.

3. Ensure transparency of proceedings

◆ Be seen to be fair to all potential tenderers and that the process is conducted without favouritism.

◆ Engage widely with stakeholders and existing contractors in advance of formal proceedings.

◆ Get all internal players to contribute to the critical success factors and key evaluation criteria, and record these!

◆ Allow sufficient time for tenderers to ‘put their case’ during evaluation, at interviews, presentations etc

4. Observe legalities

◆ Ensure compliance with EC Procurement Directives, domestic legislation, Contract Standing Orders etc., particularly in respect of advertisements, invitations, and receipt/opening of tenders, evaluation procedure and approvals.

◆ Seek legal advice and involvement in the process at the outset. You are initiating events that will result in a contract with an outside firm! You want it to be right.

5. Accommodate innovation and secure Best Value

◆ Do not ‘handcuff’ tenderers. Do not be too prescriptive in how you want the work to be delivered. Describe the ‘outcomes’ you require.

◆ Try to find ways in which specialist suppliers and contractors can contribute their expertise; allow tenderers to innovate and offer you their best solutions.

◆ Make sure you secure Best Value by considering quality, design, and Whole Life costs, and not just lowest tender price.

6. Prepare sound and complete tender documents

◆ Specify clearly what you want and describe in detail how tenderers are to price their submissions.

◆ Give sufficient thought to various pricing mechanisms such as lump-sum or schedules of rates, and how good these will be at accommodating changes.

◆ Remember, the more information you provide, particularly on the desired outcomes, the greater your chances of success.

7. Consider monitoring and payment arrangements at the outset

◆ Be clear as to how payments to the successful tender are to be calculated once they have been awarded the contract, and make payments on time.

◆ Establish the monitoring procedures that are required to satisfy the Council that the service is being delivered in accordance with that specified.

◆ Consider ‘default’ procedures, performance incentives and profit sharing.

◆ Incorporate these processes within the tender documents, as they will provide the basis of the subsequent contract document.

8. Ensure procedures provide for probity and accountability

◆ Ensure that the whole process is adequately documented and recorded to demonstrate the decision-making processes to others.

◆ Ensure all key documents are signed, dated etc. and retained to ensure that those responsible for making decisions can be held accountable.

◆ Communicate all decisions to the whole team.

9. Think before you act

◆ Review your plans before commencing. Do not ‘rush’ things – unless it is a real emergency. Inadequate time in the planning stage will lead to problems.

◆ Think what can go wrong? What if delays occur? What contingencies do you have? (e.g. slack in the timetable)? What if a key person leaves or goes off sick?

◆ Is the price/quality model practical robust and will it deliver Best Value? Ensure you test it thoroughly

10. Learn from the Process

◆ Learn, experiment, and don’t fear mistakes. Ask yourself and the rest of the team, how would you do it better next time? How can we repeat what went well, and not what went badly?

◆ Develop your skills

Dr. Jekyll and Mr.Hyde affair of Belgium Soccer Team

Millions of soccer fan today is asking the same question which pop up in mind while watching Belgium team performance in 2^nd Quarter-Final of Euro .”Are Belgium ever going to be genuine contenders or are they just a waste of good footballers ?”No doubt - That was Wales’s night, and without making no mistake they sealed a place in the last four, but Belgium’s inability to show any sort of consistency must be beyond infuriating for their management and supporters. While the Jekyll and Hyde nature of Marc Wilmots’ side is well known, what was unexpected here, when the stage was set for a great leap forward, was Belgium showing both sides of their character in the same game.

They arrived at the Stade Pierre Mauroy with a swagger in their step, looking like they meant business, as befitting a team growing stronger as the tournament progresses. They began as if they had no intention of hanging around either. After a dozen minutes of crisp, purposeful football led to an early breakthrough it was already difficult to remember how they managed to lose their opening game against Italy that too 2-0. Then they switched off again, as if suddenly remembering they were supposed to be uncomfortable with the expectations that go with being regarded among the tournament favourites, and Welsh supporters fearful of a whipping after the opening few minutes suddenly realised they were making inroads against a side that now looked distinctly ordinary. First 20 mins Belgium was attacking in Wales territory and during that period at 13 mins (if I correctly remember) they had netted a goal also but they were not in a mood to spare and they were constantly attacked Wales fortress without any more success. Suddenly the wind change and Wales team took the charge and just after 11 mins Asley Williams equalise for Wales with a fine header collected from the corner kick from Ramsey who had lost the chance to play in the semis for 2 consecutive yellow cards in 2 matches. Wales were defending for dear life just minutes into the game as Romelu Lukaku set an attack in motion and Kevin De Bruyne and Eden Hazard combined to create an opening that Yannick Carrasco should have accepted. De Bruyne and Hazard in particular are such neat, precise passers they lost no time in slicing through Wales’s three-man central defence, and just when their opponents were probably feeling relieved when the latter rolled the ball back to Radja Nainggolan in a position that looked unthreatening the Roma player unleashed a shot that arrowed into Wayne Hennessey’s top corner from 30 yards out.

Any hopes that Wales might have had that the absence of Thomas Vermaelen and Jan Vertonghen would weaken the Belgian defence initially proved unfounded. Jordan Lukaku and Jason Denayer proved capable deputies on the left, and when the former was caught out of position midway through the first half, Thibaut Courtois came to his side’s rescue to deny Neil Taylor an equaliser. If Belgium thought they had done enough to win the game they were mistaken, however, and there was no excuse for the sort of complacency that Nainggolan showed in failing to stay with Ashley Williams when defending a corner. Once they were back in the game Wales were actually on top for the rest of the first half. Here was Belgium back to looking uncertain again, with Hazard disappearing from the game, Lukaku left isolated and De Bruyne reduced to taking hopeful and ultimately wasteful pot shots from distance in the manner of England against Iceland. For a team regarded as likely finalists Belgium do not defend set pieces particularly well, and though several overlaps were created down the right wing in the first half the eventual crosses all managed to elude the not exactly inconspicuous target of Romelu Lukaku.